MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/cup.12890

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cutaneous pathology · 2017

Acral and digital angioleiomyomata: 14-year experience at the Cleveland Clinic and review of the literature.

Hammond Margaret I, Miner Andrew G, Piliang Melissa P

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Angioleiomyoma is a benign neoplasm thought to derive from the tunica media of small venous vessels. Angioleiomyomata most frequently occur in the lower extremities with less common occurrences on the trunk, head and upper extremities. Few cases of acral and digital angioleiomyoma have been described in the literature.

METHODS

We add a series of 21 patients with acral angioleiomyoma including 6 cases of digital angioleiomyoma to the body of clinical and histological findings along with a review of the literature of digital angioleiomyomata.

RESULTS

Digital angioleiomyoma are equally distributed between male and female patients and are more often painful than the angioleiomyoma of all body sites. Acral angioleiomyomata favor the feet over hands at a ratio of 2.5:1, while digital angioleiomyoma favor the fingers over toes at a ratio of 4.3:1.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that vascular leiomyoma be included in the differential diagnosis of smooth muscle tumors with particular regard to the digits of both the hands and the feet. Digital angioleiomyomata differ from acral angioleiomyomata in their equal gender distribution, increased tendency to cause pain and preponderance for the fingers over the toes.

Для цитирования: Hammond Margaret I, Miner Andrew G, Piliang Melissa P. Acral and digital angioleiomyomata: 14-year experience at the Cleveland Clinic and review of the literature.. Journal of cutaneous pathology. 2017. DOI: 10.1111/cup.12890.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.