Transfusion Thresholds and Neurological Functional Outcome After Acute Brain Injury: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Background/

Objectives

The benefits of liberal transfusion strategies for neurological outcomes in critically ill patients with acute brain injuries (ABIs) remain uncertain due to conflicting evidence and potential risks. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a liberal transfusion strategy in adults with ABI.

Methods

A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library was conducted from inception until 18 December 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing liberal and restrictive transfusion strategies in adult patients admitted to intensive care units with ABI were included. The primary outcome was unfavorable neurological function at the last follow-up, defined as Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) score <4, Extended GOS score <5, or modified Rankin Scale score >3.

Results

Among 5859 screened records, five RCTs (2385 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Liberal transfusion significantly reduced unfavorable neurological outcomes (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.82-0.95; p = 0.0009) without affecting mortality (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84-1.11; p = 0.66). A meta-analysis of two studies (n = 1465 patients) showed improved functional independence with liberal strategies (MD, 6.70; 95% CI, 2.07-11.33; p = 0.005) but no difference in quality of life (p = 0.30). Sepsis or septic shock occurred less frequently in the liberal group (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50-0.92; p = 0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that liberal strategies improved neurological outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97; p = 0.01) but did not yield significant differences in spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (p = 0.09).

Conclusions

Liberal transfusion strategies safely improve neurological outcomes in adults with ABI, specifically in the subgroup of TBI, whereas further studies are needed in patients with SAH.