DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.117
Preoperative assessment of neurovesical function in children with anorectal malformation: association with vertebral and spinal malformations.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We preoperatively assessed neurovesical function and spinal cord function in children with anorectal malformations. In cases of neurovesical dysfunction we looked for an association with vertebral malformation or myelodysplasia.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
We prospectively evaluated 80 children with anorectal malformations via preoperative urodynamics and magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Bladder compliance and volume, detrusor activity and vesicosphincteric synergy during voiding allowed urodynamic evaluation. Results were reported according to Wingspread and Krickenbeck classifications of anorectal malformations.
RESULTS
Urodynamic findings were pathological in 14 children (18%). Pathological evaluations did not seem related to type of fistula or level of anorectal malformation. Vertebral anomalies were seen in 34 patients (43%) and myelodysplasia in 16 (20%). Neither vertebral anomaly nor myelodysplasia seemed associated with type of fistula or severity of anorectal malformation. Of 14 children with pathological urodynamics no vertebral anomaly or myelodysplasia was found in 7. Of 66 children with normal urodynamics 40 presented with vertebral or spinal malformation.
CONCLUSIONS
Lower urinary tract dysfunction is common in patients with anorectal malformations. Normal spine or spinal cord does not exclude neurovesical dysfunction. Myelodysplasia or vertebral anomaly does not determine lower urinary tract dysfunction. Thus, we recommend preoperative urodynamic assessment of the bladder and magnetic resonance imaging of the spine in children with anorectal malformations.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.