MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf380

Медицинская библиотека · European heart journal. Case reports · 2025

Conservative non-surgical management of penetrating cardiac injury with three retained metal nails: a case report.

Khanipour Ramtin, Mazmanian Saro, Jung Andrew, Dahhan Ali

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Traumatic penetrating cardiac injuries are usually immediately fatal. The management approach (surgical vs. conservative) in surviving patients can be challenging. A conservative approach is appropriate in selective cases; however, long-term complications should be considered.

CASE SUMMARY: A frail 83-year-old male who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting surgery 20 years ago presented with encephalopathy. He had persistent bacteraemia. Chest computed tomography revealed three metal nails penetrating the anterior thoracic wall through the myocardium. Later, we learned that he had attempted suicide 2 years ago by shooting himself in the chest using a nail gun. Conservative non-surgical approach was pursued at that time given his multiple comorbidities. We adopted a conservative approach again. He survived for additional 6 months on chronic suppressive antimicrobial therapy but ultimately passed away from pneumonia.

DISCUSSION: The favourable outcome in this patient underscores the role of a conservative approach in selective cases. Retained foreign bodies pose a risk of infective endocarditis; therefore, empirical chronic antimicrobial therapy and tetanus vaccination should be considered.

Для цитирования: Khanipour Ramtin, Mazmanian Saro, Jung Andrew, Dahhan Ali. Conservative non-surgical management of penetrating cardiac injury with three retained metal nails: a case report.. European heart journal. Case reports. 2025. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaf380.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.