European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
Efficacy and safety of esketamine for sedation during colonoscopy: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hussein Zainab, Taha Amira Mohamed, Abouelmagd Alaa Abdrabou, Elshabrawi Mohamed Nasser, Durvesh Abdul Karim, Nada Eman Ayman, Abuelazm Mohamed, Elnaggar Mohamed, Elkhattib Ismail
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic instability during colonoscopy sedation remains a significant clinical concern. Esketamine's sympathomimetic properties may protect against these risks while reducing sedative requirements. Hence, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esketamine in improving intraprocedural sedation during colonoscopy.
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science until June 2025 for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraprocedural hypotension; secondary outcomes included bradycardia, hypoxemia, and recovery parameters. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratios (RR) and continuous outcomes using standardized mean differences (SMD), with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics.
PROSPERO ID: CRD420251105691.
RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials comprising 858 patients were included in our analysis. Esketamine significantly reduced the risk of intraprocedural hypotension (RR: 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.53; I²=58%) and the incidence of hypoxemia (RR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.73; I²=0%). A reduction in injection pain was also observed (RR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.97; I²=80.5%), though this finding showed sensitivity in leave-one-out analysis. No significant differences were found between groups in bradycardia risk (RR: 0.51, 95% CI 0.23-1.14), total propofol requirement (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.04), induction time, or procedure duration. The reduction in hypotension remained robust in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: Esketamine significantly enhanced hemodynamic stability and reduced sedative demand during colonoscopy without delaying recovery, supporting its use in high-risk patients.
METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science until June 2025 for randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was the incidence of intraprocedural hypotension; secondary outcomes included bradycardia, hypoxemia, and recovery parameters. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratios (RR) and continuous outcomes using standardized mean differences (SMD), with heterogeneity assessed via I² statistics.
PROSPERO ID: CRD420251105691.
RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials comprising 858 patients were included in our analysis. Esketamine significantly reduced the risk of intraprocedural hypotension (RR: 0.34, 95% CI 0.22-0.53; I²=58%) and the incidence of hypoxemia (RR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.19-0.73; I²=0%). A reduction in injection pain was also observed (RR: 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.97; I²=80.5%), though this finding showed sensitivity in leave-one-out analysis. No significant differences were found between groups in bradycardia risk (RR: 0.51, 95% CI 0.23-1.14), total propofol requirement (SMD: -0.23, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.04), induction time, or procedure duration. The reduction in hypotension remained robust in sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION: Esketamine significantly enhanced hemodynamic stability and reduced sedative demand during colonoscopy without delaying recovery, supporting its use in high-risk patients.