Evaluation of intestinal wall closure using vessel-sealing technology versus conventional closure: an in vivo study.

PURPOSE: Anastomotic leakage is a major postoperative complication of colorectal surgery. LigaSure™ is used commonly for vessel-sealing, but its use for intestinal anastomosis or closure, particularly the healing process, is underreported. We conducted this study to evaluate the feasibility of using LigaSure™ for intestinal wall closure, compared with hand-sewn methods.

METHODS

We performed intestinal wall closure of the cecum in rat laparotomy procedures, dividing subjects into a LigaSure™ group (LS) and a hand-sewn group (HS). We compared operation times, tissue structure changes, and pressure resistance from immediately post-operatively to postoperative day (POD) 14.

RESULTS

No postoperative dehiscence or mortality occurred in either group. The LS group required significantly less closure time (113 s) than the HS group (321 s, p < 0.001). The adhesion rates for a midline incision were not significantly different between the groups (LS: 26.7% vs. HS: 6.7%; p = 0.142), with adhesions at the closure site seen in all subjects. The LS group had a lower burst pressure than the HS group until POD 3, with no significant differences thereafter. Structural continuity was established by POD 5 in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LigaSure™ provides effective intestinal wall closure with a more distinct healing process than with hand-sewn methods, suggesting the potential for staple-free anastomosis.