MedElevator
Войти в исследования Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society · 2026
Contribution of Non-Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia to the Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death - Validation of Current Japanese Circulation Society / Japanese Heart Rhythm Society Guideline Recommendations in the Nippon Storm Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yasuoka Ryobun, Maruyama Masahiro, Noda Takashi, Nakazawa Gaku, Nitta Takashi, Aizawa Yoshifusa, Ohe Tohru, Kurita Takashi, Nippon Storm Investigators
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) in Japanese patients receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) for primary prevention remains unclear. This study aimed to verify the prognostic value of NSVT as recommended in the 2018 Japanese Circulation Society guideline.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 638 patients with structural heart disease who received an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator for primary prevention in the Nippon Storm Study. Analysis 1 (n=429) evaluated the association between NSVT history and predefined endpoints in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) or non-ischemic heart disease (non-IHD) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Analysis 2 (n=357) assessed the prognostic impact of NSVT documented by Holter electrocardiography across 2 subgroups: Subgroup 1, IHD and non-IHD; and Subgroup 2, other cardiac diagnoses. Endpoints included appropriate ICD therapy, electrical storm, ventricular fibrillation (VF), shock therapy, and mortality. In Analysis 1, a history of NSVT was not significantly associated with appropriate ICD therapy or other major adverse outcomes. In Analysis 2, Holter-documented NSVT was independently associated only with appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.82; 95% confidence interval 1.04-3.18; P=0.035). This association was significant in Subgroup 2, but not in Subgroup 1.
CONCLUSIONS: NSVT was modestly associated (HR 1.82) with appropriate ICD therapy but not with VF or mortality, suggesting reconsideration of its clinical role.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed 638 patients with structural heart disease who received an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator for primary prevention in the Nippon Storm Study. Analysis 1 (n=429) evaluated the association between NSVT history and predefined endpoints in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) or non-ischemic heart disease (non-IHD) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Analysis 2 (n=357) assessed the prognostic impact of NSVT documented by Holter electrocardiography across 2 subgroups: Subgroup 1, IHD and non-IHD; and Subgroup 2, other cardiac diagnoses. Endpoints included appropriate ICD therapy, electrical storm, ventricular fibrillation (VF), shock therapy, and mortality. In Analysis 1, a history of NSVT was not significantly associated with appropriate ICD therapy or other major adverse outcomes. In Analysis 2, Holter-documented NSVT was independently associated only with appropriate ICD therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.82; 95% confidence interval 1.04-3.18; P=0.035). This association was significant in Subgroup 2, but not in Subgroup 1.
CONCLUSIONS: NSVT was modestly associated (HR 1.82) with appropriate ICD therapy but not with VF or mortality, suggesting reconsideration of its clinical role.