MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/sti.77.2.101

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted infections · 2001

No association of anti-Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies and severity of cervical neoplasia.

Reesink-Peters N, Ossewaarde J M, Van Der Zee A G, Quint W G, Burger M P, Adriaanse A H

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether the presence of Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies is associated with the severity of neoplastic lesions in women with cervical dyskaryosis.

METHODS

In a cross sectional study in two groups of women referred for an abnormal Papanicolaou smear (group A: 296, group B: 331 women) blood samples were analysed for antichlamydial antibodies by enzyme immunoassay. Cervical neoplasia was graded histologically.

RESULTS

In group A no association was found between increasing grade of CIN and the presence of antichlamydial antibodies. The proportion (93%) of women with antichlamydial antibodies was higher in 14 women with (micro)invasive carcinoma than in women with CIN (35%). As the high prevalence of antichlamydial antibodies in women with cervical carcinoma is not consistent with prevalences reported in recent literature, we analysed a second group of women in which indeed the high prevalence was not confirmed

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the presence of circulating antichlamydial antibodies is not associated with the severity of neoplastic lesions and it seems unlikely that C trachomatis has a role in the progression of cervical neoplasia.

Для цитирования: Reesink-Peters N, Ossewaarde J M, Van Der Zee A G, Quint W G, Burger M P, Adriaanse A H. No association of anti-Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies and severity of cervical neoplasia.. Sexually transmitted infections. 2001. DOI: 10.1136/sti.77.2.101.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.