MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0300060520912104

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of international medical research · 2020

Management of injuries near the innominate artery bifurcation using an accurate kissing Viabahn stent technique.

Hu Shuang-Long, Wang Chun-Xin, Lu Hui-Jun, Yuan Ye

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of an accurate kissing Viabahn stent technique to manage injuries near the innominate artery bifurcation.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients with injuries near the innominate artery bifurcation who were treated with an accurate kissing Viabahn stent technique. Perioperative and follow-up data were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 10 patients were included (mean age, 52.8 years; six male and four female patients) with injuries at the following sites: the distal end of the innominate artery (n = 2), the innominate artery bifurcation (n = 5), the root of the right common carotid artery (n = 2) and the origin of the right subclavian artery (n = 1). All were successfully treated with the accurate kissing Viabahn stent technique. During follow-up (mean duration, 16.8 months), there were no complications, such as right upper limb ischaemia, neurological dysfunction, stent occlusion or migration.

CONCLUSIONS

The accurate kissing Viabahn stent technique to manage injuries near the bifurcation of the innominate artery was safe and effective, with good perioperative and long-term follow-up results.

Для цитирования: Hu Shuang-Long, Wang Chun-Xin, Lu Hui-Jun, Yuan Ye. Management of injuries near the innominate artery bifurcation using an accurate kissing Viabahn stent technique.. The Journal of international medical research. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520912104.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.