Respiratory care · 2026
Effects of Endotracheal Suctioning With Expiratory Pause in Infants.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dattein Peiter Ana Paula, Piva Taila Cristina, Piccoli Taciana Fassbinder, Bruno Francisco, Andreolio Cinara, Schaan Camila Wohlgemuth, Ziegler Bruna
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Endotracheal suctioning is a routine procedure in the pediatric ICU (PICU) and can be performed via open or closed systems. Closed-system suctioning has benefits for pressure maintenance in the ventilatory system and oxygen supply during the technique but is less effective. The association of an expiratory pause in closed-system suctioning is an alternative technique. We sought to evaluate the volume of suctioned secretions, respiratory mechanics, and hemodynamic parameters during closed endotracheal suctioning with expiratory pause, compared with conventional closed suctioning.
METHODS: A randomized crossover pilot trial with infants receiving invasive mechanical ventilation >24 h, with neuromuscular blocker, without cough reflex, randomized to define the order of suctioning techniques (T1-technique 1 conventional suctioning without expiratory pause; T2-technique 2: with expiratory pause), performed with a 2-h interval. Evaluated hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation), respiratory mechanics (static and dynamic compliance, inspiratory and expiratory resistance, driving pressure), and suctioning secretion were weighed on a precision balance. Shapiro-Wilk test for normally distributed variables analysis and generalized estimating equation for effect analysis.
RESULTS: Ten infants were included with a median age of 2 months (1.0-3.7). The amount of secretions from the technique with expiratory pause was significantly higher compared with conventional suctioning (mean 1.4 g vs 1.1 g; P < .001). Treatment effect was observed in the analysis of driving pressure (P < .001) and inspiratory resistance (P = .02), with an increase in these variables after suctioning with expiratory pause. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The closed-system suctioning with expiratory pause was more effective in secretion removal compared with conventional closed suctioning. However, driving pressure and inspiratory resistance increased after suctioning with an expiratory pause.
METHODS: A randomized crossover pilot trial with infants receiving invasive mechanical ventilation >24 h, with neuromuscular blocker, without cough reflex, randomized to define the order of suctioning techniques (T1-technique 1 conventional suctioning without expiratory pause; T2-technique 2: with expiratory pause), performed with a 2-h interval. Evaluated hemodynamic parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and peripheral arterial oxygen saturation), respiratory mechanics (static and dynamic compliance, inspiratory and expiratory resistance, driving pressure), and suctioning secretion were weighed on a precision balance. Shapiro-Wilk test for normally distributed variables analysis and generalized estimating equation for effect analysis.
RESULTS: Ten infants were included with a median age of 2 months (1.0-3.7). The amount of secretions from the technique with expiratory pause was significantly higher compared with conventional suctioning (mean 1.4 g vs 1.1 g; P < .001). Treatment effect was observed in the analysis of driving pressure (P < .001) and inspiratory resistance (P = .02), with an increase in these variables after suctioning with expiratory pause. There were no significant differences in hemodynamic variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The closed-system suctioning with expiratory pause was more effective in secretion removal compared with conventional closed suctioning. However, driving pressure and inspiratory resistance increased after suctioning with an expiratory pause.