ERJ open research · 2025
Peripheral airway function and disease burden in COPD.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Färdig Martin, Lingman Karin, Lisspers Karin, Ställberg Björn, Janson Christer, Högman Marieann, Malinovschi Andrei
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: While oscillometry appears advantageous over spirometry in detecting peripheral airway dysfunction, a feature of COPD, further research on its role in disease monitoring is needed. The objectives of the present study were to analyse the associations between oscillometry by impulse oscillometry (IOS) and forced oscillation technique (FOT) and airway obstruction, health status, dyspnoea and future exacerbations in COPD.
METHODS: Oscillometry and disease burden were assessed in 150 adults with COPD within the Tools Identifying Exacerbations study. At 5 Hz, abnormal resistance (R rs5) and reactance (X rs5) were defined as z-scores >1.645 and <-1.645 sd, respectively, whereas a mean difference in reactance between inspiration and expiration >2.80 cmH2O·L-1·s-1 represented abnormal ΔX rs5. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scores were obtained. Medical records were reviewed for future exacerbations (≥1) between baseline and 1 and 3 years, respectively.
RESULTS: Abnormal oscillometry correlated with disease burden, with the highest risk observed for severe airway obstruction (FEV1 <50% pred): odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals ranging from 4.80 (1.93-12.0) to 18.0 (7.13-45.3) for R rs5, X rs5 and ΔX rs5, followed by moderate to severe dyspnoea (mMRC ≥2) for ΔX rs5, COPD health status (CAT ≥10) for R rs5 and ΔX rs5 and future exacerbations (1 and 3 years) for R rs5 and X rs5, respectively, with odds ratios (95% CI) ranging from 2.77 (1.27-6.05) to 3.98 (1.38-11.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal oscillometry may be relevant in the evaluation of COPD patients, including the prediction of future exacerbation risk.
METHODS: Oscillometry and disease burden were assessed in 150 adults with COPD within the Tools Identifying Exacerbations study. At 5 Hz, abnormal resistance (R rs5) and reactance (X rs5) were defined as z-scores >1.645 and <-1.645 sd, respectively, whereas a mean difference in reactance between inspiration and expiration >2.80 cmH2O·L-1·s-1 represented abnormal ΔX rs5. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scores were obtained. Medical records were reviewed for future exacerbations (≥1) between baseline and 1 and 3 years, respectively.
RESULTS: Abnormal oscillometry correlated with disease burden, with the highest risk observed for severe airway obstruction (FEV1 <50% pred): odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals ranging from 4.80 (1.93-12.0) to 18.0 (7.13-45.3) for R rs5, X rs5 and ΔX rs5, followed by moderate to severe dyspnoea (mMRC ≥2) for ΔX rs5, COPD health status (CAT ≥10) for R rs5 and ΔX rs5 and future exacerbations (1 and 3 years) for R rs5 and X rs5, respectively, with odds ratios (95% CI) ranging from 2.77 (1.27-6.05) to 3.98 (1.38-11.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal oscillometry may be relevant in the evaluation of COPD patients, including the prediction of future exacerbation risk.