DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106259
Knowledge, attitude and practice of pregnant women towards pre-eclampsia in Chongqing, China.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
This study assessed the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of pregnant women in Chongqing, China, regarding pre-eclampsia and examined their inter-relationships.
DESIGN
A cross-sectional survey was conducted using validated questionnaires.
SETTING
The study was conducted between May 2023 and August 2023 in Chongqing, China.
PARTICIPANTS
A total of 427 pregnant women were included, with 68.15% aged ≤30 years and a mean pregnancy duration of 238.18±45.01 days.
INTERVENTIONS: This was an observational study, and interventions were applied.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the KAP scores (knowledge: 0-40; attitude: 12-60 and practice: 10-50). The correlations and structural equation modelling (SEM) analyses were conducted to explore the relationships among KAP.
RESULTS
Mean scores were 22.19±12.17 (knowledge), 46.38±6.14 (attitude) and 41.96±5.96 (practice). Knowledge positively correlated with attitude (r=0.586, p<0.001) and practice (r=0.387, p<0.001). Attitude correlated with practice (r=0.593, p<0.001). SEM showed knowledge directly influenced attitude (β=0.716, p<0.001), while attitude directly affected practice (β=0.444, p<0.001). Knowledge indirectly impacted practice via attitude (β=0.151, p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Pregnant women exhibited inadequate knowledge and a suboptimal attitude but a proactive practice. Targeted interventions to improve knowledge and attitudes are recommended for better clinical outcomes, particularly in regions where few such studies have been conducted.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.