DOI 10.3390/antibiotics14020189
Antibiotic-Resistant Salmonella Circulation in the Human Population in Campania Region (2010-2023).
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate antibiotic resistance among Salmonella strains isolated during human infection using data from the computer database (SIGLA) of the Salmonella Typing Center (Ce.Ti.Sa) of the Istituto Zooprofilattico del Mezzogiorno (IZSM).
Methods
From 2010 to 2023, the Ce.Ti.Sa laboratory tested 680 Salmonella strains against the following: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, ampicillin, azithromycin, cefixime, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, colistin, erythromycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, meropenem, nalidixic acid, pefloxacin, streptomycin, sulfisoxazole, sulfonamides, tetracyclines, tigecycline, and trimethoprim.
Results
The most common serovars were S. monophasic Typhimurium (23.2%), S. Enteritidis (16.8%), and S. Typhimurium (16.0%). Nearly all strains were resistant to azithromycin (99.4%) and showed high resistance to sulphonamides, tetracycline, streptomycin, and ampicillin. The study found that 45.8% of strains exhibited multidrug resistance. Resistance to ciprofloxacin increased over time. Serovar-specific resistance varied: S. monophasic Typhimurium was resistant to azithromycin (100.0%), tetracycline (93.0%), and ampicillin (92.4%); S. Enteritidis showed 100.0% resistance to azithromycin; S. Typhimurium had high resistance to azithromycin, streptomycin, and ampicillin; and S. Infantis was resistant to erythromycin, sulfonamides, and azithromycin.
Conclusions
The study highlights a troubling prevalence of Salmonella-resistant strains, emphasizing the need for infection prevention, proper antibiotic use in humans and animals, and the development of new antibiotics.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.