Does a closed reduction improve aesthetical and functional outcome after nasal fracture?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: How closed reduction (CR) to repair a nasal fracture affects the patient's quality of life (QoL) has not been investigated. Here, we assessed QoL before and after CR using disease-specific questionnaires and compared the QoL scores of patients with nasal fractures with normative scores from a reference cohort.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 96 patients with nasal fractures undergoing CR. Patients were interviewed about aesthetic, functional, and QoL issues before and after surgery using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory (FROI-17) and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE). Photographs of the nasal area were taken before and after surgery and reviewed. Data were compared with those from a reference cohort (n = 1000).

RESULTS

Most fractures were type I (80.6%) and most were caused by sport-related accidents (36.5%). The ROE scores increased from 67.3 preoperatively to 73.4 postoperatively (p = 0.001). The FROI-17 also improved, indicating the overall effect of the nose on QoL (p = 0.002). Compared with the reference cohort, patients felt more affected by nasal symptoms before surgery (- 9.37, p = 0.02) than by more general aspects. ROE scores returned to normative values after surgery (p < 0.001). The postoperative cohort had lower scores for the FROI-17 item overall effects of the nose on QoL than the reference cohort did, although the nasal symptom score remained higher in patients than in reference controls.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that CR can improve the aesthetical but not the functional outcome of the nose.