Enfermeria intensiva · 2026
Continuous glucose monitoring in a critically ill patient with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), intra-aortic balloon pump, and continuous renal replacement therapy: Case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pañero-Moreno Marc, Carbonell-Sabate Cristina, Conesa-González Rut, Risco-Patiño Laura, Guix-Comellas Eva Maria, Villamor-Ordozgoiti Alberto, Cordón-Arnau Tània
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Glycemic control in critically ill patients is essential to prevent complications. This study evaluates the use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (MCG) in a 58-year-old patient with Acute Myocardial Infarction (IAM), complicated by intraventricular communication (CIV) and progression to cardiogenic shock, admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (UCI).
METHODS: The patient received advanced hemodynamic support with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (BCIA), and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (TRRC). A Dexcom G7 sensor was used for 10.5 days to monitor glucose levels. Accuracy (Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD)) and clinical reliability (Clarke Error Grid) were analyzed, along with the impact on glycemic control and nursing workload.
RESULTS: The CGM system showed preliminarily high accuracy, with a MARD of 7.12%, and 100% of values fell within zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid. During 98.00% of the monitored time, glucose remained within the target range (70-180 mg/dL), with a mean of 138 mg/dL and no hypoglycaemic episodes. A 27.62% reduction in point-of-care glucose (POC-G) measurements was observed, and the need for capillary glucose testing was eliminated.
DISCUSSION: This case aligns with findings from other authors, demonstrating that CGM in critically ill patients requiring advanced hemodynamic support is accurate, reduces invasive procedures and nursing workload, and improves glycemic control. Larger clinical trials are needed to validate its routine use in the ICU.
CONCLUSIONS: CGM in patients with advanced hemodynamic support shows high accuracy and effectiveness, reducing invasiveness and nursing burden, and positioning itself as a promising tool for glycemic management in intensive care, but more clinical trials are needed.
METHODS: The patient received advanced hemodynamic support with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO), Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (BCIA), and Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (TRRC). A Dexcom G7 sensor was used for 10.5 days to monitor glucose levels. Accuracy (Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD)) and clinical reliability (Clarke Error Grid) were analyzed, along with the impact on glycemic control and nursing workload.
RESULTS: The CGM system showed preliminarily high accuracy, with a MARD of 7.12%, and 100% of values fell within zones A and B of the Clarke Error Grid. During 98.00% of the monitored time, glucose remained within the target range (70-180 mg/dL), with a mean of 138 mg/dL and no hypoglycaemic episodes. A 27.62% reduction in point-of-care glucose (POC-G) measurements was observed, and the need for capillary glucose testing was eliminated.
DISCUSSION: This case aligns with findings from other authors, demonstrating that CGM in critically ill patients requiring advanced hemodynamic support is accurate, reduces invasive procedures and nursing workload, and improves glycemic control. Larger clinical trials are needed to validate its routine use in the ICU.
CONCLUSIONS: CGM in patients with advanced hemodynamic support shows high accuracy and effectiveness, reducing invasiveness and nursing burden, and positioning itself as a promising tool for glycemic management in intensive care, but more clinical trials are needed.