MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/03009748709165272

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of rheumatology · 1987

The prevalence and clinical associations of the lupus anticoagulant in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Derksen R H, Bouma B N, Kater L

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

To determine the prevalence and clinical associations of the lupus anticoagulant (LAC) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we studied 74 patients with SLE, 6 with lupus-like disease and a heterogeneous group of 45 patients with various autoimmune diseases. LAC was demonstrated in 19 SLE patients (26%), 5 patients with lupus-like disease (83%) and in none of the other patients. Statistically significant associations were found between LAC and a history of thromboembolic events (p less than 0.001), fetal loss (p less than 0.001), thrombocytopenia (p less than 0.01), biologically false-positive VDRL test (p less than 0.02) and convulsions (p less than 0.05). A negative correlation was found between LAC and a history of butterfly rash (p less than 0.01) and the presence of antibodies against extractable nuclear antigen (p less than 0.01). No significant difference was found between LAC-negative SLE patients and patients with other autoimmune diseases with respect to the prevalence of thromboembolic events or fetal loss. We conclude that LAC is a useful marker to identify a subset of patients with SLE or lupus-like disease at risk of thromboembolic events, fetal wastage, and thrombocytopenia.

Для цитирования: Derksen R H, Bouma B N, Kater L. The prevalence and clinical associations of the lupus anticoagulant in systemic lupus erythematosus.. Scandinavian journal of rheumatology. 1987. DOI: 10.3109/03009748709165272.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.