MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fneur.2026.1976958

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in neurology · 2026

Evaluation of tip fold over in 1,575 cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Magradze Givi, Schröfel Jonas, Fries Leonie, Yildiz Cansel, Aschendorff Antje, Arndt Susan, Beck R L, Ketterer M C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Cochlear implant (CI) surgery aims to achieve atraumatic electrode array insertion to preserve residual hearing and optimize outcomes. Tip fold-over, a mechanical complication during insertion, can compromise stimulation effectiveness and may require reinsertion or revision surgery. This study investigates the incidence, influencing factors, and diagnostic approaches for tip fold-over across a large patient cohort implanted with various CI electrode array designs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent CI surgery between 2013 and 2024 at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg. Included electrode arrays were from Cochlear™ (Slim Straight [SSA], Slim Modiolar [SMA], Contour Advance [CA]), MED-EL (FlexSoft, Flex28, Flex26, Flex24), and Advanced Bionics (SlimJ, Mid Scala [MS]). Detailed reviews of surgical reports, intraoperative electrophysiological data, and postoperative imaging-evaluated independently by at least two reviewers-were performed. Diagnostic imaging modalities included cone beam computed and digital volume tomography (DVT).

RESULTS

Among 1,575 implanted ears, 13 cases of tip fold-over were detected, yielding an overall incidence of 0.83%. Notably, 10 of these occurred with precurved, perimodiolar arrays (SMA and CA, Cochlear™; MS, Advanced Bionics), while only 3 were found in straight lateral wall designs (SSA, Cochlear™). No tip fold-over events were observed with any MED-EL electrode arrays or with the SlimJ electrode array from Advanced Bionics. Intraoperative Transimpedance matrix (TIM) analysis and intraoperative X-ray reliably detected tip fold-over in cases with normal anatomy.

CONCLUSION

Electrode array design significantly influences tip fold-over risk. A potentially higher incidence has been observed with perimodiolar electrode arrays compared with flexible straight arrays. The importance of intraoperative diagnostics is underscored in this study. TIM analysis and intraoperative X-ray imaging proved effective in detecting tip fold-over events in real-time, allowing for immediate corrective action and avoiding revision surgeries. This large-scale retrospective study confirms that tip fold-over remains a rare but significant complication in CI surgery, with a higher prevalence in precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays. This study emphasizes the need for ongoing vigilance across all CI systems.

Для цитирования: Magradze Givi, Schröfel Jonas, Fries Leonie, Yildiz Cansel, Aschendorff Antje, Arndt Susan, Beck R L, Ketterer M C. Evaluation of tip fold over in 1,575 cochlear implant electrode arrays.. Frontiers in neurology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2026.1976958.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.