MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/neurolint16060092

Медицинская библиотека · Neurology international · 2024

Chronic Immune Sensory Polyradiculopathy (CISP): A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Singhal Saurabh, Khanna Rahul, Surendranath Anudeep, Chhabra Jayksh, Thakkar Vismay, Gupta Rajesh

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP) is a rare inflammatory immune disorder affecting the nervous system, primarily targeting the proximal sensory nerve roots. The condition was first described by Sinreich in 2004. We conducted a systematic review of CISP cases published on PubMed to identify common clinical presentations, along with neurophysiological, radiological, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and other findings. Our review included a total of 22 patients from 8 articles. Many patients presented with gait difficulties and sensory ataxia and were found to have normal nerve conduction studies (NCS) and electromyography (EMG) but exhibited characteristic abnormalities in somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP), elevated CSF protein levels, thickened nerve roots on contrast-enhanced lumbar spine MRIs, and histological changes on nerve root biopsies. Clinical improvement was observed following treatment with steroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). The study concluded that while CISP is rare, it is an important clinical entity to consider, as accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment can lead to significant improvements in neurological symptoms and disabilities.

Для цитирования: Singhal Saurabh, Khanna Rahul, Surendranath Anudeep, Chhabra Jayksh, Thakkar Vismay, Gupta Rajesh. Chronic Immune Sensory Polyradiculopathy (CISP): A Systematic Review of the Literature.. Neurology international. 2024. DOI: 10.3390/neurolint16060092.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.