Operative versus conservative management for 'fetal distress' in labour.

BACKGROUND

Suspected fetal distress usually results in expedited delivery of a baby (often operatively). The potential harm to a mother and baby from operative delivery may not always be justified especially when fetal distress may be misdiagnosed. Even with a correct diagnosis it is not clear whether an operative or conservative approach is better.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of operative management for fetal distress on maternal and perinatal morbidity.

SEARCH

METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (15 February 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials of operative (caesarean section or expedited vaginal delivery) versus conservative management of suspected fetal distress.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality assessment and data extraction were done by both review authors.

MAIN

RESULTS

One study of 350 women was included. This trial was carried out in 1959. There was no difference in perinatal mortality (risk ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 2.48).

AUTHORS'

CONCLUSIONS

There have been no contemporary trials of operative versus conservative management of suspected fetal distress. In settings without modern obstetric facilities, a policy of operative delivery in the event of meconium-stained liquor or fetal heart rate changes has not been shown to reduce perinatal mortality.