MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144432

Медицинская библиотека · Food chemistry · 2025

Novel bioactive peptides from ginger rhizome: Integrating in silico and in vitro analysis with mechanistic insights through molecular docking.

Purohit Kruttika, Pathak Rachana, Hayes Evan, Sunna Anwar

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Ginger (Zingiber officinale) is widely recognised for its functional benefits, primarily attributed to its diverse phytochemicals. However, its proteome remains largely unexplored. This study hypothesised that isolated peptides may exhibit different bioactivities or more targeted mechanisms of action and could be investigated at a molecular level. Proteins were enzymatically hydrolysed under five conditions, and peptides were identified using LC-MS/MS. In silico screening suggested antioxidant, ACE-inhibitory, and antibacterial properties, further assessed through molecular docking and in vitro validation. 41 potentially bioactive peptides were identified. In vitro assays confirmed these properties for selected peptides, P1 (GSPVWIIPEPT), P2 (FASYPVKK), P3 (GPEKIFYDGPYL), and P4 (IAISPSYPIK). Notably, P4 exhibited potent mixed-type ACE-inhibition and bacteriostatic effects. Molecular docking provided mechanistic insights into these interactions. These findings highlight ginger as a promising source of bioactive peptides while underscoring the need to complement AI tools with in vitro and in vivo validations due to observed discrepancies.

Для цитирования: Purohit Kruttika, Pathak Rachana, Hayes Evan, Sunna Anwar. Novel bioactive peptides from ginger rhizome: Integrating in silico and in vitro analysis with mechanistic insights through molecular docking.. Food chemistry. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.144432.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.