MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/aogs.13558

Медицинская библиотека · Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2019

Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix.

Huisman Claartje M A, Ten Eikelder Mieke L G, Mast Kelly, Oude Rengerink Katrien, Jozwiak Marta, van Dunné Frédérique, Duvekot Johannes J, van Eyck Jim, Gaugler-Senden Ingrid, de Groot Christianne J M, Franssen Maureen T M, van Gemund Nicolette, Langenveld Josje, de Leeuw Jan Willem, Oude Lohuis Eefje J, Oudijk Martijn A, Papatsonis Dimitri, van Pampus Mariëlle, Porath Martina, Rombout-de Weerd Sabina, van Roosmalen Jos J, van der Salm Paulien C M, Scheepers Hubertina C J, Sikkema Marko J, Sporken Jan, Stigter Rob H, van Wijngaarden Wim J, Woiski Mallory, Mol Ben Willem J, Bloemenkamp Kitty W M, PROBAAT-S project group

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

When women with a previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix have an indication for delivery, the choice is to induce labor or to perform a cesarean section. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of a balloon catheter as a method of induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean section and an unfavorable cervix compared with an elective repeat cesarean section.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study in 51 hospitals in the Netherlands on term women with one previous cesarean section, a live singleton fetus in cephalic position, an unfavorable cervix and an indication for delivery. We recorded obstetric, maternal and neonatal characteristics. We compared the outcome of women who were induced with a balloon catheter with the outcome of women who delivered by elective repeat cesarean section. Main outcomes were maternal and neonatal morbidity. Mode of delivery was a secondary outcome for women who were induced. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were calculated using logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Analysis was performed on 993 women who were induced and 321 women who had a repeat cesarean section (August 2011 until September 2012). Among the women who were induced, 560 (56.4%) delivered vaginally and 11 (1.1%) sustained a uterine rupture. Composite adverse maternal outcome (uterine rupture, severe postpartum hemorrhage or postpartum infection) occurred in 73 (7.4%) in the balloon and 14 (4.5%) women in the repeat cesarean section group (aOR 1.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.85-2.96). Composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar score <7 at 5 minutes or umbilical pH <7.10) occurred in 57 (5.7%) and 10 (3.2%) neonates, respectively (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87-3.48). Women who were induced had a shorter postpartum admission time (2.0 vs 3.0 days (P < 0.0001)).

CONCLUSIONS

In women with a previous cesarean section and a need for delivery, induction of labor with a balloon catheter does not result in a significant increase in adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes as compared with planned cesarean section.

Для цитирования: Huisman Claartje M A, Ten Eikelder Mieke L G, Mast Kelly, Oude Rengerink Katrien, Jozwiak Marta, van Dunné Frédérique, Duvekot Johannes J, van Eyck Jim, Gaugler-Senden Ingrid, de Groot Christianne J M, Franssen Maureen T M, van Gemund Nicolette, Langenveld Josje, de Leeuw Jan Willem, Oude Lohuis Eefje J, Oudijk Martijn A, Papatsonis Dimitri, van Pampus Mariëlle, Porath Martina, Rombout-de Weerd Sabina, van Roosmalen Jos J, van der Salm Paulien C M, Scheepers Hubertina C J, Sikkema Marko J, Sporken Jan, Stigter Rob H, van Wijngaarden Wim J, Woiski Mallory, Mol Ben Willem J, Bloemenkamp Kitty W M, PROBAAT-S project group. Balloon catheter for induction of labor in women with one previous cesarean and an unfavorable cervix.. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13558.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.