The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treating acute bacterial infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to reevaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treating acute bacterial infections.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials up to 1 January 2024, including only randomized controlled trials comparing OMC with other antibiotics in adults. Primary outcomes were clinical and microbiological responses; secondary outcomes included adverse events.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 2957 patients met the inclusion criteria. OMC showed a slightly better clinical response at the post-therapy evaluation phase in the clinically evaluable population (RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 1.01-1.05, I2 = 0%). Microbial eradication rates for Gram-positive and Gram-negative infections showed no significant differences between OMC and comparators. Safety analysis revealed no significant differences in overall AEs, treatment-related AEs, serious AEs, or drug discontinuation due to AEs. However, OMC had a lower risk of diarrhea (RR: 0.48, 95% CI = 0.23-1.00, I2 = 65%). All-cause mortality did not differ significantly between OMC and comparators.

CONCLUSIONS

OMC is a safe and effective treatment for acute bacterial infections, comparable to other antibiotics.

REGISTRATION: This study has been registered in the online systematic review database (Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO]), and the registration number is CRD42024575416.