MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.04.002

Медицинская библиотека · American journal of infection control · 2023

A meta-analysis of Legionella pneumophila contamination in hospital water systems.

Fang Zisi, Zhou Xiaocong, Liao Hui, Xu Hong

СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Legionella pneumophila is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia. We aimed to determine the pooled rates of L pneumophila contamination in the water environment of the hospital.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, WangFang and Science Direct, The Cochrane Library, and Science Finder, for relevant studies published until December 2022. Stata 16.0 software was used to determine pooled contamination rates, publication bias, and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight eligible articles with a total of 23,640 samples of water were evaluated, and the prevalence of L pneumophila was 41.6%. The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the pollution rate of L pneumophila in hot water (47.6%) was higher than that in other water bodies. The rates of L pneumophila contamination were higher in developed countries (45.2%), culture methods (42.3%), published between 1985 and 2015 (42.9%), and studies with a sample size of less than 100 (53.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

L pneumophila contamination in medical institutions is still very serious and should be paid attention to, especially in developed countries and hot water tanks.

Для цитирования: Fang Zisi, Zhou Xiaocong, Liao Hui, Xu Hong. A meta-analysis of Legionella pneumophila contamination in hospital water systems.. American journal of infection control. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.04.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.