MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2209/tdcpublication.44.29

Медицинская библиотека · The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College · 2003

Reconstruction of the inferior alveolar nerve by autologous graft: a retrospective study of 20 cases examining donor nerve length.

Takasaki Yoshito, Noma Hiroyasu, Kitami Takehiro, Shibahara Takahiko, Sasaki Ken-ichi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to confirm the length and kind of donor nerves used in nerve grafts for reconstruction of inferior alveolar nerve defects. The authors conducted a retrospective study of surgeries that were performed between 1977 and 1996. A total of 20 patients underwent nerve grafting procedures during this period. The greater auricular nerve was selected as the donor nerve in 16 cases, while the sural nerve was selected in 4. Mean lengths of donor nerves were 7.28 +/- 1.6 cm and 11.5 +/- 3.4 cm for the greater auricular and sural nerves, respectively. As indicated, the sural nerves were significantly longer (p < 0.01). Mean lengths of donor nerves grafted for partial resection and hemi-mandibulectomy were 7.23 +/- 1.6 cm and 10.8 +/- 3.4 cm, respectively. Statistical analysis indicated that grafts used in the hemi-mandibulectomy group were significantly longer (p < 0.05). In terms of types of donor nerve used in mandibulectomies, the greater auricular nerve was used in the majority of partial resections, and the sural nerve was employed for hemi-mandibulectomy.

Для цитирования: Takasaki Yoshito, Noma Hiroyasu, Kitami Takehiro, Shibahara Takahiko, Sasaki Ken-ichi. Reconstruction of the inferior alveolar nerve by autologous graft: a retrospective study of 20 cases examining donor nerve length.. The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College. 2003. DOI: 10.2209/tdcpublication.44.29.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.