Revista de gastroenterologia de Mexico · 2005
[Manometry and defecography in constipated patients with dyschezia].
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marrufo-García César A, Sánchez-Avila Ma Teresa, Morales-Garza Luis A, Carrillo-Martínez Miguel A, Aguirre-Mar David, Sánchez-Avila Juan Francisco
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Constipation is one of the most frequent disorders in Gastroenterology. Radiologic and physiologic studies are essential to the diagnosis and treatment of constipated patients.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the usefulness of manometry and defecography in constipated patients with suspect of dyssynergic defecation.
METHODS: Dyschesic patients referred for anorectal testing, all patients underwent anorectal manometry and defecography.
RESULTS: Fifty eight patients consecutive patients referred from 1998 to 2003. According to manometric findings patients were classified in patients without dyssynergia (group I, n = 16) and patients with dyssynergia (group II, n = 42). Group I patients had intussusception (75%), abnormal rectal emptying (56%), rectocele > 2.5 cm (56%), perineal descending (50%) and inadequate opening of the anal canal (38%). Group II patients had inadequate opening of the anal canal (69%), rectocele < 2.5 cm (55%), perineal descending (17%), intussusception (45%) and abnormal rectal emptying (55%). Group I had a higher frequency of perineal descending (p = 0.01) and intussusception (p = 0.044). Group II had a higher frequency of inadequate opening of the anal canal (p = 0.03), and not for inadequate opening of the anorectal angle.
CONCLUSIONS: Defecography showed disorders in group I that may contribute to symptomatology, and in group II the inadequate opening of the anal canal suggests the participation of different parts of the external anal sphincter other than puborectalis in the genesis of dyssynergia.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess the usefulness of manometry and defecography in constipated patients with suspect of dyssynergic defecation.
METHODS: Dyschesic patients referred for anorectal testing, all patients underwent anorectal manometry and defecography.
RESULTS: Fifty eight patients consecutive patients referred from 1998 to 2003. According to manometric findings patients were classified in patients without dyssynergia (group I, n = 16) and patients with dyssynergia (group II, n = 42). Group I patients had intussusception (75%), abnormal rectal emptying (56%), rectocele > 2.5 cm (56%), perineal descending (50%) and inadequate opening of the anal canal (38%). Group II patients had inadequate opening of the anal canal (69%), rectocele < 2.5 cm (55%), perineal descending (17%), intussusception (45%) and abnormal rectal emptying (55%). Group I had a higher frequency of perineal descending (p = 0.01) and intussusception (p = 0.044). Group II had a higher frequency of inadequate opening of the anal canal (p = 0.03), and not for inadequate opening of the anorectal angle.
CONCLUSIONS: Defecography showed disorders in group I that may contribute to symptomatology, and in group II the inadequate opening of the anal canal suggests the participation of different parts of the external anal sphincter other than puborectalis in the genesis of dyssynergia.