MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00535-025-02324-x

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of gastroenterology · 2025

Efficacy and recovery of remimazolam versus midazolam in sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan (RECOVER Study).

Yamaguchi Daisuke, Ichijima Ryoji, Ikehara Hisatomo, Minoda Yosuke, Esaki Mitsuru, Takamori Ayako, Yoh Akiyoshi, Shirouzu Moeko, Sadashima Kento, Fujimura Yutaro, Shimamura Takuya, Takedomi Hironobu, Akutagawa Takashi, Tsuruoka Nanae, Sakata Yasuhisa, Wada Takuya, Kusano Chika, Shimoda Ryo, Esaki Motohiro

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Sedation is increasingly essential for gastrointestinal endoscopy. Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine, has a shorter pharmacokinetic half-life than midazolam. The aim of this study was to determine whether remimazolam provides superior procedural sedation in Japanese patients.

METHODS

The cohort of this prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind controlled trial comprised adults (18-80 years) scheduled for sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Participants were randomized to remimazolam and midazolam groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of ambulatory patients 5 min after endoscopy. Secondary outcomes were successful pre-procedure sedation (Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation ≤ 4), dose of sedative to achieve sedation, time to ambulation, and adverse events.

RESULTS

From October 2024 to January 2025, 40 patients were enrolled. After excluding two outliers 38 were analyzed (remimazolam, n = 20; midazolam, n = 18). Ambulation at 5 min occurred in 85.0% (17/20) of the remimazolam versus 0.0% (0/18) of the midazolam group (p < 0.0001). Mean time from procedure end to walking was 4.25 min (range 0.0-10.0) for remimazolam and 35.56 min (10.0-60.0) for midazolam (p < 0.0001). Pre-procedure sedation was successful (MOAA/S ≤ 4) in 100% of both groups. Mean doses to achieve sedation were 4.30 mg (3.0-7.0) for remimazolam and 3.11 mg (2.0-5.0) for midazolam (p = 0.003). Hypoxemia occurred in 5.0% of the remimazolam and 33.3% of the midazolam group (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

In upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, remimazolam achieved markedly faster recovery and a lower incidence of hypoxemia than midazolam. Rates of achieving target sedation were equivalent. These findings indicate remimazolam is an effective and potentially safer sedative option for Japanese patients undergoing endoscopy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: This research was registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (trial number jRCTs071240062) on September 26, 2024.

Для цитирования: Yamaguchi Daisuke, Ichijima Ryoji, Ikehara Hisatomo, Minoda Yosuke, Esaki Mitsuru, Takamori Ayako, Yoh Akiyoshi, Shirouzu Moeko, Sadashima Kento, Fujimura Yutaro, Shimamura Takuya, Takedomi Hironobu, Akutagawa Takashi, Tsuruoka Nanae, Sakata Yasuhisa, Wada Takuya, Kusano Chika, Shimoda Ryo, Esaki Motohiro. Efficacy and recovery of remimazolam versus midazolam in sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Japan (RECOVER Study).. Journal of gastroenterology. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-025-02324-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.