MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00404-016-4139-1

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2016

Recurrent shoulder dystocia: is it predictable?

Kleitman Vered, Feldman Roi, Walfisch Asnat, Toledano Ronen, Sheiner Eyal

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To examine the course and outcome of deliveries occurring in women who previously experienced shoulder dystocia. In addition, recurrent shoulder dystocia risk factors were assessed.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis comparing all singleton deliveries with and without shoulder dystocia in their preceding delivery was conducted. Independent predictors of recurrent shoulder dystocia were investigated using a multiple logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Of the 201,422 deliveries included in the analysis, 307 occurred in women with a previous shoulder dystocia (0.015 %). Women with a history of shoulder dystocia were more likely to be older, experienced higher rates of gestational diabetes mellitus, polyhydramnios, prolonged second stage, operative delivery and macrosomia (>4000 g) in the following delivery. Previous shoulder dystocia was found to be an independent risk factor for recurrent shoulder dystocia (OR = 6.1, 95 % CI 3.2-11.8, p value <0.001) in the multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Shoulder dystocia is an independent risk factor for recurrent shoulder dystocia. Deliveries in women with a history of shoulder dystocia are characterized by higher rates of operative delivery, prolonged second stage of labor and macrosomia.

Для цитирования: Kleitman Vered, Feldman Roi, Walfisch Asnat, Toledano Ronen, Sheiner Eyal. Recurrent shoulder dystocia: is it predictable?. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4139-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.