DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.135
Anaphylactic Shock After Indocyanine Green Video Angiography During Cerebrovascular Surgery.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Indocyanine green (ICG) video angiography has been widely used in cerebrovascular surgery. ICG injection is generally safe, with a low incidence of complications. ICG-related anaphylactic reactions during neurosurgery have been rarely reported. We report the cases of 2 patients who had experienced anaphylactic shock in response to intravenous ICG injection (DID Indocyanine Green [Dongindang, Inc., Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea]) during intracranial aneurysm (IA) surgery.
CASE DESCRIPTION: The first patient, a 69-year-old woman with an unruptured IA, had been undergoing clipping surgery under general anesthesia. Immediately after ICG injection, her blood pressure suddenly decreased from 140/80 mm Hg to 50/30 mm Hg and she developed a skin rash on her abdomen and all extremities. Chest compression was initiated, and her vital signs gradually recovered to their pre-ICG levels within 10 minutes. The second patient was a 58-year-old woman with an unruptured IA who had been undergoing clipping surgery. After ICG injection, her blood pressure had decreased from 130/80 mm Hg to 60/40 mm Hg, and a rash-like skin lesion was observed on her abdomen. After intravenous injection of norepinephrine and dexamethasone, her blood pressure recovered to its pre-ICG level within 30 minutes and remained stable thereafter. The postoperative ICG skin provocation test findings were positive for both patients; however, only 1 patient showed markedly increased serum tryptase levels.
CONCLUSION
Despite the rarity of ICG-related anaphylaxis, clinicians should be aware of this unexpected, but potentially life-threatening, drug reaction in patients undergoing cerebrovascular surgery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.