MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09553002.2016.1233370

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of radiation biology · 2016

RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA).

Oestreicher Ursula, Samaga Daniel, Ainsbury Elizabeth, Antunes Ana Catarina, Baeyens Ans, Barrios Leonardo, Beinke Christina, Beukes Philip, Blakely William F, Cucu Alexandra, De Amicis Andrea, Depuydt Julie, De Sanctis Stefania, Di Giorgio Marina, Dobos Katalin, Dominguez Inmaculada, Duy Pham Ngoc, Espinoza Marco E, Flegal Farrah N, Figel Markus, Garcia Omar, Monteiro Gil Octávia, Gregoire Eric, Guerrero-Carbajal C, Güçlü İnci, Hadjidekova Valeria, Hande Prakash, Kulka Ulrike, Lemon Jennifer, Lindholm Carita, Lista Florigio, Lumniczky Katalin, Martinez-Lopez Wilner, Maznyk Nataliya, Meschini Roberta, M'kacher Radia, Montoro Alegria, Moquet Jayne, Moreno Mercedes, Noditi Mihaela, Pajic Jelena, Radl Analía, Ricoul Michelle, Romm Horst, Roy Laurence, Sabatier Laure, Sebastià Natividad, Slabbert Jacobus, Sommer Sylwester, Stuck Oliveira Monica, Subramanian Uma, Suto Yumiko, Que Tran, Testa Antonella, Terzoudi Georgia, Vral Anne, Wilkins Ruth, Yanti LusiYanti, Zafiropoulos Demetre, Wojcik Andrzej

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Two quality controlled inter-laboratory exercises were organized within the EU project 'Realizing the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB)' to further optimize the dicentric chromosome assay (DCA) and to identify needs for training and harmonization activities within the RENEB network.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The general study design included blood shipment, sample processing, analysis of chromosome aberrations and radiation dose assessment. After manual scoring of dicentric chromosomes in different cell numbers dose estimations and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were submitted by the participants.

RESULTS

The shipment of blood samples to the partners in the European Community (EU) were performed successfully. Outside the EU unacceptable delays occurred. The results of the dose estimation demonstrate a very successful classification of the blood samples in medically relevant groups. In comparison to the 1st exercise the 2nd intercomparison showed an improvement in the accuracy of dose estimations especially for the high dose point.

CONCLUSIONS

In case of a large-scale radiological incident, the pooling of ressources by networks can enhance the rapid classification of individuals in medically relevant treatment groups based on the DCA. The performance of the RENEB network as a whole has clearly benefited from harmonization processes and specific training activities for the network partners.

Для цитирования: Oestreicher Ursula, Samaga Daniel, Ainsbury Elizabeth, Antunes Ana Catarina, Baeyens Ans, Barrios Leonardo, Beinke Christina, Beukes Philip, Blakely William F, Cucu Alexandra, De Amicis Andrea, Depuydt Julie, De Sanctis Stefania, Di Giorgio Marina, Dobos Katalin, Dominguez Inmaculada, Duy Pham Ngoc, Espinoza Marco E, Flegal Farrah N, Figel Markus, Garcia Omar, Monteiro Gil Octávia, Gregoire Eric, Guerrero-Carbajal C, Güçlü İnci, Hadjidekova Valeria, Hande Prakash, Kulka Ulrike, Lemon Jennifer, Lindholm Carita, Lista Florigio, Lumniczky Katalin, Martinez-Lopez Wilner, Maznyk Nataliya, Meschini Roberta, M'kacher Radia, Montoro Alegria, Moquet Jayne, Moreno Mercedes, Noditi Mihaela, Pajic Jelena, Radl Analía, Ricoul Michelle, Romm Horst, Roy Laurence, Sabatier Laure, Sebastià Natividad, Slabbert Jacobus, Sommer Sylwester, Stuck Oliveira Monica, Subramanian Uma, Suto Yumiko, Que Tran, Testa Antonella, Terzoudi Georgia, Vral Anne, Wilkins Ruth, Yanti LusiYanti, Zafiropoulos Demetre, Wojcik Andrzej. RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA).. International journal of radiation biology. 2016. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1233370.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.