MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/ijerph14010012

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016

Legionella Risk Management and Control in Potable Water Systems: Argument for the Abolishment of Routine Testing.

Whiley Harriet

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Legionella is an opportunistic pathogen of public health significance. One of the main sources of Legionella is potable water systems. As a consequence of aging populations there is an increasing demographic considered at high risk for Legionellosis and, as such, a review of the guidelines is required. Worldwide, Legionella has been detected from many potable water sources, suggesting it is ubiquitous in this environment. Previous studies have identified the limitations of the current standard method for Legionella detection and the high possibility of it returning both false negative and false positive results. There is also huge variability in Legionella test results for the same water sample when conducted at different laboratories. However, many guidelines still recommend the testing of water systems. This commentary argues for the removal of routine Legionella monitoring from all water distribution guidelines. This procedure is financially consuming and false negatives may result in managers being over-confident with a system or a control mechanism. Instead, the presence of the pathogen should be assumed and focus spent on managing appropriate control measures and protecting high-risk population groups.

Для цитирования: Whiley Harriet. Legionella Risk Management and Control in Potable Water Systems: Argument for the Abolishment of Routine Testing.. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2016. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14010012.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.