MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Irish medical journal · 2018

Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Non-Consultant Hospital Doctors In The Immediate Post-Fall Period.

O’Reilly D, Rutledge N, Hurson C, Clifford G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Aim The aim of this study is to determine the knowledge, attitudes and practices of Non-Consultant Hospital Doctors (NCHDs) in the immediate post-fall period. Methods A survey study design was employed using an online questionnaire of all NCHDs in SVUH comprising 15 questions that blend dichotomous, multiple choice, scaled and open-ended questions to determine knowledge, attitudes and practices of NCHDs across three constructs; injury management, falls prevention and fracture prevention. Descriptive statistics was used to analyse data. Results There was a 40% response rate (n=105). The respondents reported dissatisfaction with their standard of falls assessment training (mean 4/10). Between 60-70% of NCHDs do not routinely determine hip trauma, joint tenderness, syncope, use of anti-coagulants, visual symptoms, amnesia or vomiting. Half of respondents (n=57) rarely or never rationalised medications. The main reasons for this are lack of knowledge of alternatives (63%), time constraints (65%), benefits outweighing the risks (80%) and reluctance to interfere with care of another medical team (86%). Only 9% always consider a bone health review. Discussion A targeted education programme in the areas of hip assessment, neurological assessment, syncope management, medication rationalisation and bone protection is warranted.

Для цитирования: O’Reilly D, Rutledge N, Hurson C, Clifford G. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Non-Consultant Hospital Doctors In The Immediate Post-Fall Period.. Irish medical journal. 2018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.