MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/00016340500342052

Медицинская библиотека · Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2006

Transvaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse using autologous fascia lata graft.

Mølsted-Pedersen Lars, Rudnicki Martin, Lose Gunnar

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The aim was to describe the operative technique of transvaginal repair of enterocele and apical prolapse using autologous fascia lata and report intra- and postoperative complications and long-term outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 74 consecutive patients who had repair of a symptomatic enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse or uterine prolapse from January 1987 to August 1999. All patients were followed for a minimum of 3 months and 61 were available for long-term evaluation at 18-106 months (median 52 months).

RESULTS

Intra- and postoperative complications were few. Pelvic examination at long-term follow-up disclosed a recurrence rate for enterocele of 1.7%, vaginal vault prolapse of 8.3%, and cystocele of 15%. Ninety-one per cent were subjectively satisfied with the relief of mechanical vaginal symptoms. Only 35% (6/17) were cured of constipation. Out of the 22 women who were sexually active after the procedure, 12 (54%) experienced improved quality.

CONCLUSION

Repair of the posterior compartment defect and suspension of the vaginal vault using autologous fascia lata graft provides acceptable intra- and postoperative complication and long-term results.

Для цитирования: Mølsted-Pedersen Lars, Rudnicki Martin, Lose Gunnar. Transvaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse using autologous fascia lata graft.. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2006. DOI: 10.1080/00016340500342052.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.