Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie : MKG · 2006
[About the functional aspect of septorhinoplasty].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Oeken J, Kiefer M C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Rhinosurgeons emphasize the functional aspect of septorhinoplasty (SRP). So far only a few publications with exact data exist.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients (33 male symbol; 19 female symbol, average age: 37 years) were examined before and approx. 1 year after SRP. Rhinomanometry, olfactometry, and photographic documentation were carried out. Using a questionnaire they were asked about the functional outcome and about their original personal aims concerning the SRP.
RESULTS: All patients suffered from a deviated septum. Regarding the external aspect 38 patients had a crooked nose with or without a hump, 7 patients had a hump without external deviated nose, and 7 patients had a saddle nose or other deformities. If total nasal airflow is considered rhinomanometry showed no significant improvement postoperatively (p=0.115). If only the worse nasal side is considered rhinometry showed a highly significant improvement (p=0.002). In the questionnaire 34 patients (65%) indicated an improvement, 14 patients (27%) no change, and 4 patients a deterioration of the nasal airflow. The final aesthetic outcome was assessed by 39 patients (75%) as an improvement, by 12 patients (23%) as unchanged, and by 1 patient (2%) as worse. There were no significant changes in the olfactory function. Asked about their personal aims 29 patients (56%) wished first of all an improvement of nasal airflow, 5 patients (10%) a good aesthetic result, and 18 patients (34%) both aspects.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that use of the term "functional" SRP is justified. In the majority of cases a simultaneously existing functional-plastic problem is solved. Our results support the importance of rhinomanometry as an objective parameter in the perioperative diagnostic battery of nasal obstruction.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients (33 male symbol; 19 female symbol, average age: 37 years) were examined before and approx. 1 year after SRP. Rhinomanometry, olfactometry, and photographic documentation were carried out. Using a questionnaire they were asked about the functional outcome and about their original personal aims concerning the SRP.
RESULTS: All patients suffered from a deviated septum. Regarding the external aspect 38 patients had a crooked nose with or without a hump, 7 patients had a hump without external deviated nose, and 7 patients had a saddle nose or other deformities. If total nasal airflow is considered rhinomanometry showed no significant improvement postoperatively (p=0.115). If only the worse nasal side is considered rhinometry showed a highly significant improvement (p=0.002). In the questionnaire 34 patients (65%) indicated an improvement, 14 patients (27%) no change, and 4 patients a deterioration of the nasal airflow. The final aesthetic outcome was assessed by 39 patients (75%) as an improvement, by 12 patients (23%) as unchanged, and by 1 patient (2%) as worse. There were no significant changes in the olfactory function. Asked about their personal aims 29 patients (56%) wished first of all an improvement of nasal airflow, 5 patients (10%) a good aesthetic result, and 18 patients (34%) both aspects.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that use of the term "functional" SRP is justified. In the majority of cases a simultaneously existing functional-plastic problem is solved. Our results support the importance of rhinomanometry as an objective parameter in the perioperative diagnostic battery of nasal obstruction.