MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.112014

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical anesthesia · 2025

Safety and feasibility of intraoperative high PEEP titrated to the lowest driving pressure during anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery - Interim analysis of GENERATOR.

Vermeulen Tom D, Dorland Galina, Hol Liselotte, Nijbroek Sunny, Serpa Neto Ary, Bouwman Arthur R A, Robba Chiara, Battaglini Denise, Rubulotta Francesca, Mazzinari Guido, Matot Idit, Laffey John G, Koopman Joseph S H A, Ball Lorenzo, Gasteiger Lukas, Schober Patrick, Hollmann Markus W, Schultz Marcus J, Hemmes Sabrine N T, van Meenen David M P, GENERATOR investigators

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during minimally invasive abdominal surgery is uncertain. Intraoperative ventilation with individualized high PEEP and recruitment maneuvers can be used to keep the driving pressure (ΔP) low, but can also lead to hypotension. In addition, the resulting ΔP and feasibility of individualized high PEEP in minimally invasive abdominal surgery is unclear.

METHODS

Planned interim analysis on safety and feasibility of 'Driving Pressure During General Anesthesia for Minimally Invasive Abdominal Surgery' (GENERATOR), an ongoing randomized clinical trial that compares individualized high PEEP, titrated to the lowest ΔP, with a standard low PEEP ventilation strategy with respect to postoperative pulmonary complications. The primary endpoint for this analysis was the proportion of patients with intraoperative hypotension. Secondary endpoints were other intraoperative complications, ventilation variables and feasibility parameters.

RESULTS

From December 2023 to July 2024, 181 patients were enrolled. Data for analysis were available for 177 patients, of which 87 patients were randomized to individualized high PEEP and 90 to standard low PEEP. Intraoperative hypotension was similar between the individualized high PEEP vs standard low PEEP group (11.5 vs 11.1 %, relative risk ratio 1.0 [95 % CI 0.5-2.4], p = 1.00), while vasopressor use was higher in the intervention group. The median difference in ΔP between both groups was 6 cm H2O. Protocol compliance was 81.6 % in the individualized high PEEP group vs 97.8 % in the standard low PEEP group; most instances of non-compliance in the individualized high PEEP group concerned a level of PEEP that was too high.

DISCUSSION: In minimally invasive abdominal surgery, a ventilation strategy using individualized high PEEP was not associated with a higher incidence of hypotension, but did show an increased use of vasopressors. The intervention was highly feasible, and led to a lower ΔP. These interim findings warrant confirmation in the main analysis of GENERATOR.

FUNDING: This research was funded by ZonMW, grant number 10390012110091.

Для цитирования: Vermeulen Tom D, Dorland Galina, Hol Liselotte, Nijbroek Sunny, Serpa Neto Ary, Bouwman Arthur R A, Robba Chiara, Battaglini Denise, Rubulotta Francesca, Mazzinari Guido, Matot Idit, Laffey John G, Koopman Joseph S H A, Ball Lorenzo, Gasteiger Lukas, Schober Patrick, Hollmann Markus W, Schultz Marcus J, Hemmes Sabrine N T, van Meenen David M P, GENERATOR investigators. Safety and feasibility of intraoperative high PEEP titrated to the lowest driving pressure during anesthesia for minimally invasive abdominal surgery - Interim analysis of GENERATOR.. Journal of clinical anesthesia. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.112014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.