MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11255-008-9449-1

Медицинская библиотека · International urology and nephrology · 2008

Vesico-vaginal fistula: report of 220 cases.

Hadzi-Djokic Jovan, Pejcic Tomislav P, Acimovic Miodrag

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To present the major causes, diagnosis, indications, and basic principles of surgical treatment of vesico-vaginal fistulas (VVF).

METHODS

From 1978 to 2004, 235 surgical procedures in 220 women with vesico-vaginal fistulas were performed at the Clinical Center of Serbia, Urological Clinic, due to primary or recurrent VVF. There were 220 primary procedures: 129 transvesical approaches (TVES), 59 transvaginal repairs (TVAG), and 32 transperitoneal approaches with flap interposition (TPA). Transvesical approach was the most common procedure in the early period (1978-1993) and less frequent in the late period (1994-2004). The main causes of VVF were hysterectomy for benign conditions (62.7%), hysterectomy for malignant conditions (30.4%), cesarean section (5.9%), and obstetric injuries (0.9%).

RESULTS

There was no perioperative mortality. There were fifteen recurrent fistula formations: twelve after the first operation and three after the second. The recurrence rates between the procedures were comparable: TVES 6.6%, TVAG 6.4%, and TPA 5.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

The total recurrence rate of 6.4% did not differ significantly between various procedures. However, TVAG is less invasive and suitable for uncomplicated cases, whereas TPA should be recommended for great and recurrent VVF.

Для цитирования: Hadzi-Djokic Jovan, Pejcic Tomislav P, Acimovic Miodrag. Vesico-vaginal fistula: report of 220 cases.. International urology and nephrology. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-008-9449-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.