The Journal of urology · 2000
Bacterial dna sequences in prostate tissue from patients with prostate cancer and chronic prostatitis.
СтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Krieger J N, Riley D E, Vesella R L, Miner D C, Ross S O, Lange P H
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Although bacterial genetic material has been detected in prostate tissue from patients with various disorders, the prevalence of these organisms is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that bacterial detection rates differ between patients with prostate cancer and those with the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sterile prostate biopsies were obtained during radical retropubic prostatectomy from 107 patients with prostate cancer and using a perineal approach from 170 with the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome. Numerous controls were also evaluated. Bacterial ribosomal encoding DNA (165 rDNA) sequences were detected using a polymerase chain reaction assay. Selected positives were cloned, sequenced and compared with DNA databases.
RESULTS: Bacterial DNA sequences were detected in 21 (19. 6%) of 107 patients with prostate cancer compared to 79 (46.4%) of 170 with chronic prostatitis (p <0.0001). These bacteria included urogenital pathogens, other described microorganisms and bacteria not reported previously.
CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial DNA sequences may be identified in prostate tissue from many patients. Bacterial detection rates in prostate tissue appear to differ among populations, with higher rates among patients with the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome than among those with prostate cancer. Future studies of the role of various bacteria in the prostate may provide insight into the pathophysiology of prostate disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sterile prostate biopsies were obtained during radical retropubic prostatectomy from 107 patients with prostate cancer and using a perineal approach from 170 with the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome. Numerous controls were also evaluated. Bacterial ribosomal encoding DNA (165 rDNA) sequences were detected using a polymerase chain reaction assay. Selected positives were cloned, sequenced and compared with DNA databases.
RESULTS: Bacterial DNA sequences were detected in 21 (19. 6%) of 107 patients with prostate cancer compared to 79 (46.4%) of 170 with chronic prostatitis (p <0.0001). These bacteria included urogenital pathogens, other described microorganisms and bacteria not reported previously.
CONCLUSIONS: Bacterial DNA sequences may be identified in prostate tissue from many patients. Bacterial detection rates in prostate tissue appear to differ among populations, with higher rates among patients with the chronic prostatitis/pelvic pain syndrome than among those with prostate cancer. Future studies of the role of various bacteria in the prostate may provide insight into the pathophysiology of prostate disease.