MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000337405

Медицинская библиотека · Onkologie · 2012

Penile metastasis from primary bladder cancer: a study of 8 cases and review of the literature.

Zhu Yi-Ping, Yao Xu-Dong, Zhang Hai-Liang, Shen Yi-Jun, Huang Dan, Ye Ding-Wei

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Penile metastases from primary bladder cancer are extremely rare.

CASE REPORT: The medical records of 8 patients who presented with metastatic penile carcinoma originating from bladder between 2002 and 2010 were analyzed. The main complaint was a painless nodule (6 cases), priapism (1 case), and penile pain (1 case). All of the penile metastases were metachronous. The interval between primary cancer and penile metastases ranged from 1 to 100 months (mean 26.4 months). Total penectomy combined with systemic chemotherapy was the treatment of choice in 4 cases. 1 patient only accepted external beam radiotherapy, and 3 patients only accepted chemotherapy due to disseminated disease. The time interval between penile metastases and death ranged from 4 to 23 months (mean 11.4 months).

CONCLUSION

Penile metastases secondary to primary bladder cancer are rare and represent a challenging problem. The common mode of spread to the penis is by retrograde venous route. The overall outcome is very poor, and most patients will die within 1 year despite systemic chemotherapy and supportive care. Radical ablative surgery is justified only for symptomatic relief.

Для цитирования: Zhu Yi-Ping, Yao Xu-Dong, Zhang Hai-Liang, Shen Yi-Jun, Huang Dan, Ye Ding-Wei. Penile metastasis from primary bladder cancer: a study of 8 cases and review of the literature.. Onkologie. 2012. DOI: 10.1159/000337405.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.