MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.047

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2011

Right ductus arteriosus: facts and theory.

Bronshtein Moshe, Zimmer Etan Z, Blazer Shraga, Blumenfeld Zeev

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To report fetal right-sided persistent ductus arteriosus (RPDA) in association with right aortic arch (RAA).

STUDY

DESIGN

Extensive sonographic fetal anatomical scans were consecutively performed on 19,874 private, self-referred pregnant women who wanted early sonographic detection of fetal anomalies.

RESULTS

Of 19,874 transvaginal (TVS) sonographic examinations 40 fetuses had right aortic arch (RAA) and four of them (10%) had RPDA. We also diagnosed seven cases of RPDA with involvement of the left aortic arch where a right-curving pattern ("L" shape) parallel to the right pulmonary artery was suggestive of Rt. DA with left aortic arch. Only one (9%) of the RPDA cases was associated with a cardiac anomaly (double outlet right ventricle). None of the other eight RPDA cases had any discernible anomalies, and all of the fetuses with RPDA had normal karyotypes.

CONCLUSIONS

In 10% of the fetuses with right aortic arch the ductal arch was also on the right side. An unusual-looking DA may be a RPDA associated with the left aortic arch. In most cases, the RPDA is a normal variant not associated with other anomalies.

Для цитирования: Bronshtein Moshe, Zimmer Etan Z, Blazer Shraga, Blumenfeld Zeev. Right ductus arteriosus: facts and theory.. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.07.047.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.