MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.05.008

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses · 2019

Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia Quality Between Patients Addicted and Not Addicted to Opium.

Razavi Majid, Bameshki Alireza, Jarahi Lida, Saghari Mahdieh

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the quality of spinal anesthesia between opium-dependent and opium-naive patients.

DESIGN

A case-control study.

METHODS

Two groups of subjects including opium-dependent and opium-naive patients (30 per group) were enrolled. Spinal anesthesia was performed using 15 mg of bupivacaine. The level of anesthesia was assessed every minute for 10 min and then every 10 min for 180 min. Motor block was recorded at 10, 60, 120, and 180 minutes. The duration of anesthesia was recorded.

FINDINGS: The mean duration of spinal anesthesia was significantly shorter in opium-dependent patients (101.45 ± 28.670) than in opium-naive patients (126.14 ± 24.206) (P = .003). The mean onset of sensory block was not significantly different between the two groups (4.14 ± 1.62 vs 3.69 ± 1.36, P = .259).

CONCLUSIONS

Substance abuse affects the duration of spinal anesthesia, so it is recommended to use intravenous medications or higher doses of spinal marcaine for these patients.

Для цитирования: Razavi Majid, Bameshki Alireza, Jarahi Lida, Saghari Mahdieh. Comparison of Spinal Anesthesia Quality Between Patients Addicted and Not Addicted to Opium.. Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.05.008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.