Transplantation · 2024
Potential and Uncertainties of RejectClass in Acute Kidney Graft Dysfunction: An Independent Validation Study.
СтатьяВалидационное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
von Samson-Himmelstjerna Friedrich A, Kakavand Nassim, Gleske Charlotte, Schraml Florian, Basta Agathe A, Braunisch Matthias C, Bräsen Jan H, Schmitz Jessica, Kraus Daniel, Weinmann-Menke Julia, Zacharias Helena U, Vaulet Thibaut, Naesens Maarten, Krautter Markus, Schwenger Vedat, Esser Grit, Kolbrink Benedikt, Amann Kerstin, Holzmann-Littig Christopher, Echterdiek Fabian, Kunzendorf Ulrich, Renders Lutz, Schulte Kevin, Heemann Uwe, TRABIO study group
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Kidney graft rejections are classified based on the Banff classification. The RejectClass algorithm, initially derived from a cohort comprising mostly protocol biopsies, identifies data-driven phenotypes of acute rejection and chronic pathology using Banff lesion scores. It also provides composite scores for inflammation activity and chronicity. This study independently evaluates the performance of RejectClass in a cohort consisting entirely of indication biopsies.
METHODS: We retrospectively applied RejectClass to 441 patients from the German TRABIO (TRAnsplant BIOpsies) cohort who had received indication biopsies. The primary endpoint was death-censored graft failure during 2 y of follow-up.
RESULTS: The application of RejectClass to our cohort demonstrated moderately comparable phenotypic features with the derivation cohort, and most clusters indicated an elevated risk of graft loss. However, the reproduction of all phenotypes and the associated risks of graft failure, as depicted in the original studies, was not fully accomplished. In contrast, adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses substantiated that both the inflammation score and the chronicity score are independently associated with graft loss, exhibiting hazard ratios of 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.3; P = 0.002) and 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6; P < 0.001), respectively, per 0.25-point increment (scale: 0.0-1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The composite inflammation and chronicity scores may already have direct utility in quantitatively assessing the disease stage. Further refinement and validation of RejectClass clusters are necessary to achieve more reliable and accurate phenotyping of rejection.
METHODS: We retrospectively applied RejectClass to 441 patients from the German TRABIO (TRAnsplant BIOpsies) cohort who had received indication biopsies. The primary endpoint was death-censored graft failure during 2 y of follow-up.
RESULTS: The application of RejectClass to our cohort demonstrated moderately comparable phenotypic features with the derivation cohort, and most clusters indicated an elevated risk of graft loss. However, the reproduction of all phenotypes and the associated risks of graft failure, as depicted in the original studies, was not fully accomplished. In contrast, adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses substantiated that both the inflammation score and the chronicity score are independently associated with graft loss, exhibiting hazard ratios of 1.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.3; P = 0.002) and 2.2 (95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6; P < 0.001), respectively, per 0.25-point increment (scale: 0.0-1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The composite inflammation and chronicity scores may already have direct utility in quantitatively assessing the disease stage. Further refinement and validation of RejectClass clusters are necessary to achieve more reliable and accurate phenotyping of rejection.