Birth defects research · 2026
Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Models for Pregnancy-Related Syndromes.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Yanqi
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy-related syndromes, such as hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preterm birth, pose a significant global health burden, affecting maternal and fetal outcomes. Traditional screening methods, reliant on isolated biomarkers or linear models, often fail to address the complex pathophysiology of these conditions.
METHOD: This review synthesizes current literature on machine learning applications in obstetric care, analyzing multimodal data integration from electronic health records, biochemical markers, multi-omics, and imaging. It outlines model development workflows, including preprocessing for class imbalance (e.g., SMOTE) and interpretability tools (e.g., SHAP), while addressing ethical and technical challenges.
RESULTS: Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning (e.g., CNNs) outperform logistic regression, achieving AUC values > 0.90. Key advancements include federated learning for privacy and bias mitigation strategies to enhance generalizability across populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning-based models enable predictive, preventive, and personalized obstetrics, facilitating early interventions and improved perinatal outcomes, though external validation and regulatory frameworks are essential for clinical adoption.
METHOD: This review synthesizes current literature on machine learning applications in obstetric care, analyzing multimodal data integration from electronic health records, biochemical markers, multi-omics, and imaging. It outlines model development workflows, including preprocessing for class imbalance (e.g., SMOTE) and interpretability tools (e.g., SHAP), while addressing ethical and technical challenges.
RESULTS: Ensemble methods (e.g., Random Forest, XGBoost) and deep learning (e.g., CNNs) outperform logistic regression, achieving AUC values > 0.90. Key advancements include federated learning for privacy and bias mitigation strategies to enhance generalizability across populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning-based models enable predictive, preventive, and personalized obstetrics, facilitating early interventions and improved perinatal outcomes, though external validation and regulatory frameworks are essential for clinical adoption.