Trajectories of self-management and independence in youth with spina bifida: Demographic predictors of growth.
Аннотация
AIM: The purpose of this study was to examine the trajectories of condition and independent living self-management in youth with spina bifida (SB).
METHODS
A diverse sample of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with SB completed the Adolescent/Young Adult Self-Management and Independence Scale (AMIS-II) across four time points. Parents reported on demographic characteristics including age, sex, race/ethnicity, and family income. Growth in self-management and its subscales (condition and independent living) were estimated using linear mixed-effect models as a function of respondents' demographics.
RESULTS
This study included 99 respondents age 18 to 27 years old. About half were female (52.5%) and White (52.5%); 15.2% were Black, and about a third were Hispanic/Latino (32.3%). Eighty-seven AYAs (87.9%) had myelomeningocele. The lesion level was 31.3% sacral, 48.5% lumbar and 18.2% thoracic. A third of the families earned less than 50K. Overall, self-management growth was dependent on age, sex, and race/ethnicity, but not income. Growth in condition self-management depended on sex; only males demonstrated increasing growth ( β ̂ = 0.11, p < 0.001). Black participants endorsed higher increasing total and condition self-management when compared with White ( β ̂ diff = 0.17 and 0.17, respectively, both p < 0.05) and Hispanic/Latino ( β ̂ diff = 0.18 and 0.21, respectively, both p = 0.02) respondents.
CONCLUSION
This study provides evidence of differences in growth of self-management by demographic/social determinants of health. Possible reasons for differences are discussed. Predictors of changes in self-management behaviours over time in young adults with SB can identify subgroups in need of further study.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.