MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.17219/acem/171001

Медицинская библиотека · Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University · 2023

A comparison of different symptomatic reflux esophagitis treatments: A real-world study.

Di Mario Francesco, Crafa Pellegrino, Franzoni Lorella, Tursi Antonio, Brandimarte Giovanni, Russo Michele, Rodriguez-Castro Kryssia Isabel, Franceschi Marilisa, Bortoli Nicola De, Savarino Edoardo

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are currently the reference drugs for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but symptoms often recur after their withdrawal. Moreover, whether prokinetics or barrier drugs used alongside PPIs are more effective remains under debate.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of different therapeutic approaches to GERD treatment.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

We enrolled 211 grade A reflux esophagitis patients who consented to participate in this non-randomized, open-label trial. The study consisted of 6 sequentially administered medical treatments for GERD, lasting 2 months, with a 3-week washout period between each drug schedule: Group A: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast); Group B: mucosal protective drugs (a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and poloxamer 407, or a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and aluminum, 3 times daily after a meal); Group C: prokinetics (levosulpiride 25 mg or domperidone 10 mg, 3 times daily before a meal); Group D: barrier drug (alginate 3 times daily after a meal); Group E: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast) and mucosal protective drugs (a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and poloxamer 407, or a combination of hyaluronic acid, chondroitin sulfate and aluminum, before sleep); Group F: PPI (esomeprazole 40 mg/day before breakfast) and prokinetics (levosulpiride 25 mg or domperidone 10 mg before lunch and dinner). Symptoms were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and global symptomatic score (GSS), as follows: heartburn: 0-3; retrosternal chest pain: 0-3; regurgitation: 0-3.

RESULTS

All but 2 treatments (groups C and D) significantly improved VAS and GSS, with group E showing the most significant GSS improvement. Group C had the highest number of dropouts due to treatment failure and reported more side effects.

CONCLUSION

Using PPIs and mucosal protective drugs resulted in significant symptom alleviation. However, the administration of prokinetics caused higher dropouts due to treatment failure.

Для цитирования: Di Mario Francesco, Crafa Pellegrino, Franzoni Lorella, Tursi Antonio, Brandimarte Giovanni, Russo Michele, Rodriguez-Castro Kryssia Isabel, Franceschi Marilisa, Bortoli Nicola De, Savarino Edoardo. A comparison of different symptomatic reflux esophagitis treatments: A real-world study.. Advances in clinical and experimental medicine : official organ Wroclaw Medical University. 2023. DOI: 10.17219/acem/171001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.