MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/aog.0000000000004243

Медицинская библиотека · Obstetrics and gynecology · 2021

Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Leitao Mario M, Zhou Qin C, Schiavone Maria B, Cowan Renee A, Smith Evan S, Iasonos Alexia, Veith Mitchell, Rafizadeh Michael, Curran Katherine, Ramesh Bhavani, Chang Kaity, Chi Dennis S, Sonoda Yukio, Brown Amy K, Cosin Jonathan A, Abu-Rustum Nadeem R, Martino Martin A, Mueller Jennifer J, Long Roche Kara, Jewell Elizabeth L, Broach Vance, Lambrou Nicholas C, Diaz John P, Zivanovic Oliver

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the effectiveness of prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy in patients undergoing laparotomy for gynecologic surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled trial. Eligible, consenting patients, regardless of body mass index (BMI), who were undergoing laparotomy for presumed gynecologic malignancy were randomly allocated to standard gauze or negative pressure wound therapy. Patients with BMIs of 40 or greater and benign disease also were eligible. Randomization, stratified by BMI, occurred after skin closure. The primary outcome was wound complication within 30 (±5) days of surgery. A sample size of 343 per group (N=686) was planned.

RESULTS

From March 1, 2016, to August 20, 2019, we identified 663 potential patients; 289 were randomized to negative pressure wound therapy (254 evaluable participants) and 294 to standard gauze (251 evaluable participants), for a total of 505 evaluable patients. The median age of the entire cohort was 61 years (range 20-87). Four hundred ninety-five patients (98%) underwent laparotomy for malignancy. The trial was eventually stopped for futility after an interim analysis of 444 patients. The rate of wound complications was 17.3% in the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) group and 16.3% in the gauze group, absolute risk difference 1% (90% CI -4.5 to 6.5%; P=.77). Adjusted odds ratio controlling for estimated blood loss and diabetes was 0.99 (90% CI 0.62-1.60). Skin blistering occurred in 33 patients (13%) in the NPWT group and in three patients (1.2%) in the gauze group (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Negative pressure wound therapy after laparotomy for gynecologic surgery did not lower the wound complication rate but did increase skin blistering.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02682316.

FUNDING SOURCE: The protocol was supported in part by KCI/Acelity.

Для цитирования: Leitao Mario M, Zhou Qin C, Schiavone Maria B, Cowan Renee A, Smith Evan S, Iasonos Alexia, Veith Mitchell, Rafizadeh Michael, Curran Katherine, Ramesh Bhavani, Chang Kaity, Chi Dennis S, Sonoda Yukio, Brown Amy K, Cosin Jonathan A, Abu-Rustum Nadeem R, Martino Martin A, Mueller Jennifer J, Long Roche Kara, Jewell Elizabeth L, Broach Vance, Lambrou Nicholas C, Diaz John P, Zivanovic Oliver. Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy After Laparotomy for Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2021. DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004243.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.