MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0377-1237(08)80096-2

Медицинская библиотека · Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2011

Management of Mandibular Fractures.

Thapliyal G K, Sinha R, Menon P S, Chakranarayan A

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the cases of mandibular fractures treated by open reduction and rigid fixation at the Armed Forces Medical College, Pune.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirteen mandibular fractures cases were treated by open reduction and rigid fixation from Jun 1998 to Jun 2006. These were retrospectively analyzed based on the following patient related factors i.e. mode of injury, age and sex distribution, site of injury, associated injuries and surgical treatment.

RESULT: The significant finding was that the most common etiology for fracture mandible was road traffic accidents (RTA), [196 (92%)]. Of the patients who reported, 147 (95.4%) were males in the third decade of life. 96 (45%) patients had parasymphysis fractures, 65 (30.5%) had angle fractures, 33 (15%) subcondylar fractures, 17 (7.9%) body fractures and 2(0.9%) had ramus fracture. Early intervention using open reduction and internal fixation was the protocol followed which resulted in minimum morbidity and complications.

CONCLUSION

As RTA especially two wheelers accidents appeared to be the most common cause of mandibular fractures, use of suitably designed protective head gear (crash helmets) is advisable. Moreover open reduction and rigid internal fixation appears to be the suitable treatment modality in successful treatment of mandibular fractures in reducing morbidity and complications and ensuring early return to normalcy.

Для цитирования: Thapliyal G K, Sinha R, Menon P S, Chakranarayan A. Management of Mandibular Fractures.. Medical journal, Armed Forces India. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/s0377-1237(08)80096-2.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.