Heart failure reviews · 2026
Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a contemporary head-to-head comparison.
СтатьяОбзорСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Siopi Stavroula A, Antonitsis Polychronis, Karapanagiotidis Georgios T, Tagarakis Georgios, Voucharas Christos, Anastasiadis Kyriakos
Аннотация
Modern technology has expanded the armamentarium of temporary mechanical circulatory support devices implemented for hemodynamic stabilization of patients in cardiogenic shock. The predominately used ones are intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), Impella devices, and extracorporeal life support (ECLS) circuits. They are transcutaneous or surgically implanted, utilized for up to 30 days and can either assist or totally replace cardiac function, providing time for myocardial healing (bridge to recovery) or treatment escalation (bridge to destination therapy, bridge to transplantation). In light of the recently published joint consensus of the Perioperative Quality Initiative and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Cardiac Society on temporary mechanical circulatory support, purpose of the current review is to provide a succinct head-to-head comparison of widely available devices, as well as current escalation, de-escalation and antithrombotic protocols; thus, it proposes immediately translatable device selection and operation algorithms to medical professionals for optimal patient care and effective management of cardiogenic shock.