Seizure · 2023
Reduced total number of enlarged perivascular spaces in post-traumatic epilepsy patients with unilateral lesions - a feasibility study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hlauschek Gernot, Lossius Morten I, Schwartz Daniel L, Silbert Lisa C, Hicks Amelia J, Ponsford Jennie L, Vivash Lucy, Sinclair Benjamin, Kwan Patrick, O'Brien Terrence J, Shultz Sandy R, Law Meng, Spitz Gershon
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We investigated the value of automated enlarged perivascular spaces (ePVS) quantification to distinguish chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with post-traumatic epilepsy (PTE+) from chronic TBI patients without PTE (PTE-) in a feasibility study.
METHODS: Patients with and without PTE were recruited and underwent an MRI post-TBI. Multimodal auto identification of ePVS algorithm was applied to T1-weighted MRIs to segment ePVS. The total number of ePVS was calculated and corrected for white matter volume, and an asymmetry index (AI) derived.
RESULTS: PTE was diagnosed in 7 out of the 99 participants (male=69) after a median time of less than one year since injury (range 10-22). Brain lesions were observed in all 7 PTE+ cases (unilateral=4, 57%; bilateral=3, 43%) as compared to 40 PTE- cases (total 44%; unilateral=17, 42%; bilateral=23, 58%). There was a significant difference between PTE+ (M=1.21e-4, IQR [8.89e-5]) and PTE- cases (M=2.79e-4, IQR [6.25e-5]) in total corrected numbers of ePVS in patients with unilateral lesions (p=0.024). No differences in AI, trauma severity and lesion volume were seen between groups.
CONCLUSION: This study has shown that automated quantification of ePVS is feasible and provided initial evidence that individuals with PTE with unilateral lesions may have fewer ePVS compared to TBI patients without epilepsy. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to determine the value of ePVS quantification as a PTE-biomarker.
METHODS: Patients with and without PTE were recruited and underwent an MRI post-TBI. Multimodal auto identification of ePVS algorithm was applied to T1-weighted MRIs to segment ePVS. The total number of ePVS was calculated and corrected for white matter volume, and an asymmetry index (AI) derived.
RESULTS: PTE was diagnosed in 7 out of the 99 participants (male=69) after a median time of less than one year since injury (range 10-22). Brain lesions were observed in all 7 PTE+ cases (unilateral=4, 57%; bilateral=3, 43%) as compared to 40 PTE- cases (total 44%; unilateral=17, 42%; bilateral=23, 58%). There was a significant difference between PTE+ (M=1.21e-4, IQR [8.89e-5]) and PTE- cases (M=2.79e-4, IQR [6.25e-5]) in total corrected numbers of ePVS in patients with unilateral lesions (p=0.024). No differences in AI, trauma severity and lesion volume were seen between groups.
CONCLUSION: This study has shown that automated quantification of ePVS is feasible and provided initial evidence that individuals with PTE with unilateral lesions may have fewer ePVS compared to TBI patients without epilepsy. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to determine the value of ePVS quantification as a PTE-biomarker.