MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/14767058.2022.2139173

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians · 2022

Female fertility treatment and adverse birth outcomes: a multistate analysis of pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system data.

Uribe Danielle, Haak Peterson, Nechuta Sarah

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The popularity of fertility treatments has continued to rise, however, the potential health risks of these treatments for both mother and infant are not fully known. Our objective was to determine the association between fertility treatments and adverse birth outcomes of intended pregnancies using the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) data.

METHODS

Data from 27,018 intended pregnancies, collected from 2009 to 2018 in the United States, were included in our analysis. PRAMS data consisted of questionnaire and birth certificate data. SAS 9.4 was used for analyses accounting for complex survey weights. All analyses were conducted separately for singleton and twin births. Weighted percentages with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for maternal characteristics and birth outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs for associations of fertility treatment use and adverse birth outcomes.

RESULTS

Close to 12% of women reported the use of any fertility treatment. Among those using fertility treatments, the most common type was assisted reproductive technology (ART) for both twin (68.7%, 95% CI: 62.3, 75.2) and singleton births (45.1%, 95% CI: 42.0, 48.1). Use of any type of fertility treatment for singleton births was associated with increased odds of a cesarean delivery (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.16, 1.47), preterm birth (OR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.20, 1.67), a small-for-gestational age infant (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.44), and an infant hospital stay >5 days (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.11, 1.62). Use of fertility treatment for twin births was associated with cesarean delivery only. In analyses examining associations for specific types of treatment (medication alone, ART, insemination) with birth outcomes, results varied by treatment type.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large population-based sample of women who intended to become pregnant and had a live birth, fertility treatment was associated with adverse birth outcomes. Patients seeking fertility treatment should be appropriately counseled on the risks of adverse maternal and infant birth outcomes overall and by treatment type. Maternal support and resources to prevent adverse birth outcomes among women using fertility treatments are warranted.

Для цитирования: Uribe Danielle, Haak Peterson, Nechuta Sarah. Female fertility treatment and adverse birth outcomes: a multistate analysis of pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system data.. The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2139173.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.