m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026

Online Signal-to-Noise Management for Evoked Potentials-Assessing and Explaining Response Quality.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Fischer Gerald, Holzknecht Maria E, Haueisen Jens, Baumgarten Daniel, Kofler Markus

Аннотация

(1) Background: Evoked potentials (EPs) are an elegant, non-invasive, and reliable technique for assessing the functional integrity of neural pathways. They are, however, often limited by the difficulty and time needed to consistently distinguish signal from noise. (2) Methods: We have recently proposed a novel technique based on spectral domain evoked-to-background ratio (EBR) that enables fast data acquisition with online feedback about actual signal quality utilizing state of the art analog-to-digital conversion. Furthermore, we have developed a novel model-based signal-to-noise management concept allowing for suppression of biological and technical interference (swallowing, stimulation artifacts, electropolarization, and powerline potentials) and for online assessment of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for EPs. In this work, we experimentally confirmed this concept in ten healthy volunteers by investigating cortical EPs and high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) following median nerve stimulation. (3) Results: Both mathematical model and human data demonstrate that spectral target-band EBR governs the progress in SNR with increasing sweep count. For cortical EPs, SNR exceeded 10 dB beyond 90 averages in all participants. An SNR > 20 dB documented excellent signal quality and reproducibility. For HFOs, the SNR shifted to lower values by 12 dB, displaying pronounced individual variation, however, with smaller variation of HFO-band background activity (1.9 vs. 7.6 dB between the 25% and 75% percentile). Thus, individual HFO responses are more important for actual signal extraction compared to background activity. In subjects displaying a high HFO amplitude, reproducibility was confirmed for less than 1000 sweeps. (4) Conclusions: The present investigations confirm that individual EBR is the major factor defining SNR. Background noise can be reduced to a negligible level. Online assessment of background activity will allow for the most accurate moment-to-moment visualization of raw signal quality. This will facilitate termination of the data acquisition and may be based on quantified signal quality rather than predefined sweep count.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты