Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2015
Intestinal perforation in very preterm neonates: risk factors and outcomes.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shah J, Singhal N, da Silva O, Rouvinez-Bouali N, Seshia M, Lee S K, Shah P S, Canadian Neonatal Network
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare neonatal outcomes of preterm infants (born at <32 weeks' gestation) with focal/spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)-related perforation, NEC without perforation or no NEC/perforation.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 17,426 infants admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units during 2010 to 2013. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality or morbidity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe retinopathy, periventricular leukomalacia or nosocomial infection). Association of intestinal perforation with neonatal outcome was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULT: SIP was present in 178 (1.0%) infants, NEC-related perforation in 246 (1.4%) and NEC without perforation in 538 (3.1%). Any intestinal perforation was associated with higher odds of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 8.21, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6.26 to 10.8); however, the odds were significantly lower for focal/SIP compared with NEC-related perforation (AOR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.51).
CONCLUSION: Of the two types of intestinal perforation, NEC-related perforation was associated with the highest risk of an adverse neonatal outcome.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 17,426 infants admitted to Canadian neonatal intensive care units during 2010 to 2013. The primary outcome was a composite of mortality or morbidity (bronchopulmonary dysplasia, severe retinopathy, periventricular leukomalacia or nosocomial infection). Association of intestinal perforation with neonatal outcome was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression.
RESULT: SIP was present in 178 (1.0%) infants, NEC-related perforation in 246 (1.4%) and NEC without perforation in 538 (3.1%). Any intestinal perforation was associated with higher odds of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 8.21, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 6.26 to 10.8); however, the odds were significantly lower for focal/SIP compared with NEC-related perforation (AOR: 0.29, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.51).
CONCLUSION: Of the two types of intestinal perforation, NEC-related perforation was associated with the highest risk of an adverse neonatal outcome.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
CanadaCross InfectionEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant MortalityInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesIntensive Care Units, NeonatalIntestinal PerforationLogistic ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness Index